GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT 5.1

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT 5.1: GPT-3.5 Turbo is cheaper by 85% on average. GPT-3.5 Turbo from OpenAI (16,385-token context, tool calls) vs. GPT 5.1 from Azure OpenAI (272,000-token context, reasoning, tool calls). Use Agent Command Center to A/B both in shadow mode and pick the winner per workload.

Side-by-side cost

Live workload comparison

Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.

3,000
0272,000
400
0128,000
5,000
01,000,000
OpenAI
$320/mo
Input $0.500/M · Output $1.50/M
Azure OpenAI
$1,179/mo
Input $1.25/M · Output $10.00/M
At this workload, GPT-3.5 Turbo is 73% cheaper than GPT 5.1 — a savings of $860/month ($10,318/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
  model: gpt-3-5-turbo
  provider: openai
fallback:
  model: gpt-5-1
  provider: azure-openai
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 }   # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live
GPT-3.5 Turbo GPT 5.1
Input price $0.500/M $1.25/M
Output price $1.50/M $10.00/M
Context window 16,385 272,000
Max output 4,096 128,000
Function calling
Vision
Audio input
Reasoning
Prompt caching
Structured output
Pricing verified May 12, 2026 May 12, 2026
Cheaper option
~85% cheaper than GPT 5.1
Larger context
272,000 tokens
More capabilities
5 of 6 capability flags advertised

Benchmark comparison

Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.

Chatbot Arena ELOgeneral
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
1,455
AIME 2025math
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
94.0%
GPQA Diamondreasoning
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
88.1%
MMMUmultimodal
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
85.4%
τ-bench (retail)agent
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
77.9%
SWE-bench Verifiedagent
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
76.3%
τ-bench (airline)agent
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
67.0%
FrontierMathmath
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT 5.1
26.7%