Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) vs DeepSeek R1
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) vs DeepSeek R1: Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) is cheaper by 26% on average. Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) from Anthropic (200,000-token context, reasoning, tool calls) vs. DeepSeek R1 from Azure AI Foundry (128,000-token context, reasoning). Use Agent Command Center to A/B both in shadow mode and pick the winner per workload.
Side-by-side cost
Live workload comparison
Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.
3,000
0200,000
400
064,000
5,000
01,000,000
At this workload, Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) is 19% cheaper than DeepSeek R1 — a savings of $184/month ($2,210/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
model: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
provider: anthropic
fallback:
model: deepseek-r1
provider: azure-ai-foundry
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 } # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live| Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01) | DeepSeek R1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.00/M | $1.35/M |
| Output price | $5.00/M | $5.40/M |
| Context window | 200,000 | 128,000 |
| Max output | 64,000 | 8,192 |
| Function calling | ✓ | — |
| Vision | ✓ | — |
| Audio input | — | — |
| Reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt caching | ✓ | — |
| Structured output | ✓ | — |
| Pricing verified | May 12, 2026 | May 12, 2026 |
Benchmark comparison
Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.
Chatbot Arena ELOgeneral
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01)
1,310
DeepSeek R1
1,361
HumanEvalcode
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01)
89.5%
DeepSeek R1
89.7%
MMLU-Proreasoning⚠ different settings
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01)
72.4%
DeepSeek R1
84.0%
GPQA Diamondreasoning⚠ different settings
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01)
55.2%
DeepSeek R1
71.5%
SWE-bench Verifiedagent
Claude Haiku 4.5 (2025-10-01)
52.0%
DeepSeek R1
49.2%