AI Evaluations

LLMs

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Mastering Model and Prompt Selection: A Step-by-Step Guide

Last Updated

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Jun 29, 2025

Rishav Hada

By

Rishav Hada
Rishav Hada
Rishav Hada

Time to read

19 mins

Model and prompt selection
Model and prompt selection
Model and prompt selection
Model and prompt selection
Model and prompt selection
Model and prompt selection
Model and prompt selection

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Model and Prompt Selection is the first big hurdle you face when you build with a Large Language Model. Options range from GPT-4 to PaLM-2, and each one reacts differently to every prompt. Because the list of choices looks endless, many teams freeze. The task isn’t as hard as it first appears. Break it into a few clear steps and the path comes into focus. In the next sections, we’ll walk you through how Model and Prompt Selection works, why it counts, and the simple moves you can try today to get results right away.


Step 1: Understand Your Use Case

Before you start tweaking prompts, pause for a moment and ask, “What exactly do I need?” That single question becomes your compass. It will guide every later choice—model size, budget limits, and the prompt-engineering tricks you lean on.

  • Summarization tool. If you want clean overviews, craft prompts that keep the text short yet complete. Coherence and coverage sit at the top of your wish list.

  • Customer-support chatbot. Here, tone is everything. Build prompts that nudge the bot to stay friendly, answer quickly, and stick to the issue at hand.

  • Data-extraction helper. Precision rules the day. Your prompts must fence off hallucinations and force the model to return only the fields you name.

Pro tip: Write your three must-haves—say accuracy, speed, and cost—on a sticky note. Keep that note in sight through the whole Model and Prompt Selection journey, and let it steer every experiment you run.


Step 2: Choose the Right Large Language Model 

GPT-4 

  • What it nails: Whenever a paragraph twists, turns, or hides a double meaning, this model keeps its balance. It tracks long chains of logic, spots tiny shifts in tone, and returns prose that makes sense on the first read.

  • What it costs you: Each prompt pulls a little more cash from your wallet, and the reply lingers for an extra beat—nothing drastic, but you’ll notice if you’re running a big batch.

  • When to reach for it: Call on this heavyweight for work that must be airtight—contract clauses that lawyers will pore over, clinical notes where a single phrase can change a diagnosis, or any back-and-forth that digs deep rather than skimming the surface.

PaLM-2 

  • Strengths: This model shines when you switch between languages. Give it English, Spanish, or Korean, and it keeps tone and grammar on point, making it handy for any team that serves a global audience.

  • Trade-off: Ask it to follow a long, twisty chain of logic and it may slip once or twice, GPT-4 still holds the edge on deep reasoning.

  • Best use: Drop it into a live translation widget, bulk-convert documents for international staff, or power any feature that needs to flip text from one language to another without losing the original meaning.

Smaller Models (GPT-3.5, open source) 

  • Where it saves money: This lean model runs on a tight budget and pushes out replies almost as soon as you hit “send,” so you can serve thousands of users without sweating the bill.

  • Where it slips up: Give it a question packed with industry jargon like deep-sea shipping law or vintage-amp circuitry and it may gloss over key points that a larger model would catch.

  • Where it shines: Drop it into an FAQ bot, let it stamp quick category tags on blog posts, or use it for any high-volume chore where speed and thrift matter more than perfect nuance.

Pro tip: Start small for budget work, then lift to GPT-4 only if scores miss your mark. That way, Model and Prompt Selection stays cost-smart.

Step 3: Craft Effective Prompts

Start Simple, Then Iterate 

Start simple. Type, “Summarize this text for me,” and hit enter. When the response appears, copy it word-for-word; that untouched draft is your baseline for judging every tweak you try next.

Add Context and Instructions 

Refine: “Summarize in four lines, focus on key facts, avoid opinion.”

Summarize the following text: ""..."

  • Add Context and Instructions

If the output isn’t quite right, provide more detail.

Example:

Summarize the following text in 3-4 sentences,focusing on key points without adding opinions: "..."

  • Test Variations
    Try different styles to see what works best.
    Role-based prompt

You are an expert editor. Summarize this text concisely and professionally:"..."

  • Question-based prompt

What are the main points of this text? Summarize in 3 sentences.

  • Use Few-Shot Examples

When the assignment turns tricky, slip a couple of short, side-by-side examples into your prompt - first the input, then the kind of answer you’re after. Those tiny demos paint a clear picture, helping the model hit the mark on its own.

Example:

Here’s how summaries should look: 

- Text: "Example 1" → Summary: "Example summary 1." 

- Text: "Example 2" → Summary: "Example summary 2." 

Now summarize: "..."

Test Variations 

  • Role-based: You are a senior editor. Summarize concisely.

  • Question-based: What are the core points? Answer in three lines.

Step 4: Balance Trade-Offs

  • Cost vs Performance: Short prompts with small models are cheap but may miss depth.

  • Speed vs Depth: Longer prompts lift accuracy, yet latency climbs.

Pro tip: Place simple tasks on smaller models and save GPT-4 for high-value calls. This split approach keeps Model and Prompt Selection efficient.

Step 5: Iterate and Refine 

No first draft wins.

  1. Score outputs with BLEU, ROUGE, or human review.

  2. Adjust wording - add or cut details.

  3. Swap models when your metrics stall.

Example workflow

Round

Model

Prompt change

Result

1

GPT-3.5

Basic prompt

Fast but shallow

2

GPT-4

Added role + limits

Rich yet pricy

3

Mix

GPT-3.5 for fetch; GPT-4 for final

Best balance


Tools to Speed Model and Prompt Selection 

  • OpenAI Playground – Live test prompts, tweak temperature, adjust tokens.

  • LangChain – Run many prompts and models in parallel pipelines.

  • Evaluation Frameworks – BLEU, ROUGE, or custom metrics.

  • Human Feedback Loops – Ask users and labelers to score answers.


Future AGI’s Experiment Feature Simplifies Everything 

With Future AGI, you can:

  1. Define Multiple Prompts – Upload detailed, simple, or few-shot versions.

Define Multiple Prompts
  1. Choose a Suite of Models – Compare GPT-4, PaLM-2, and more.

  2. Set Custom Evaluations – Track accuracy, latency, and cost.

Custom Evaluations
  1. View a Dashboard – Side-by-side charts show instant winners.

  2. Get Winner Recommendation – The  Future AGI platform takes care of the heavy lifting. It scores each model-prompt pair, lines them up from strongest to weakest, and shows the clear front-runner first so you spot the best option in seconds.

best-performing model and prompt combination.

Example: A summarization team loads GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, two prompt styles, and scores coherence. The dashboard names the best combo in minutes, making Model and Prompt Selection data-driven.


Conclusion

Great Model and Prompt Selection feels hard, yet it’s just a loop: know your goal, pick a model, craft prompts, measure, and refine. Keep iterating. Your ideal setup will emerge, and you’ll build adaptive AI that grows with your product.

So, embrace the process using Future AGI and your best Model and Prompt Selection outcome is only a few trials away!

FAQs

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Why does Model and Prompt Selection need iteration?

Does Prompt Engineering differ for GPT-4?

How many prompts should I test?

Can I automate Model and Prompt Selection fully?

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Rishav Hada is an Applied Scientist at Future AGI, specializing in AI evaluation and observability. Previously at Microsoft Research, he built frameworks for generative AI evaluation and multilingual language technologies. His research, funded by Twitter and Meta, has been published in top AI conferences and earned the Best Paper Award at FAccT’24.

Rishav Hada is an Applied Scientist at Future AGI, specializing in AI evaluation and observability. Previously at Microsoft Research, he built frameworks for generative AI evaluation and multilingual language technologies. His research, funded by Twitter and Meta, has been published in top AI conferences and earned the Best Paper Award at FAccT’24.

Rishav Hada is an Applied Scientist at Future AGI, specializing in AI evaluation and observability. Previously at Microsoft Research, he built frameworks for generative AI evaluation and multilingual language technologies. His research, funded by Twitter and Meta, has been published in top AI conferences and earned the Best Paper Award at FAccT’24.

Related Articles

Related Articles

future agi background
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo
Background image

Ready to deploy Accurate AI?

Book a Demo