GPT 5.1 vs o1
GPT 5.1 vs o1: GPT 5.1 is cheaper by 92% on average. GPT 5.1 from Azure OpenAI (272,000-token context, reasoning, tool calls) vs. o1 from Azure OpenAI (200,000-token context, reasoning, tool calls). Use Agent Command Center to A/B both in shadow mode and pick the winner per workload.
Side-by-side cost
Live workload comparison
Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.
3,000
0272,000
400
0128,000
5,000
01,000,000
At this workload, GPT 5.1 is 89% cheaper than o1 — a savings of $9,321/month ($111,858/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
model: gpt-5-1
provider: azure-openai
fallback:
model: o1
provider: azure-openai
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 } # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live| GPT 5.1 | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M | $15.00/M |
| Output price | $10.00/M | $60.00/M |
| Context window | 272,000 | 200,000 |
| Max output | 128,000 | 100,000 |
| Function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio input | — | — |
| Reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured output | ✓ | — |
| Pricing verified | May 12, 2026 | May 12, 2026 |
Benchmark comparison
Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.
GPQA Diamondreasoning⚠ different settings
GPT 5.1
88.1%
o1
77.3%
MMMUmultimodal⚠ different settings
GPT 5.1
85.4%
o1
78.2%
SWE-bench Verifiedagent⚠ different settings
GPT 5.1
76.3%
o1
48.9%