DeepSeek V3 vs Grok 3

DeepSeek V3 vs Grok 3: DeepSeek V3 is cheaper by 70% on average. DeepSeek V3 from Azure AI Foundry (128,000-token context) vs. Grok 3 from xAI (131,072-token context, tool calls). Use Agent Command Center to A/B both in shadow mode and pick the winner per workload.

Side-by-side cost

Live workload comparison

Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.

3,000
0131,072
400
0131,072
5,000
01,000,000
Azure AI Foundry
$798/mo
Input $1.14/M · Output $4.56/M
xAI
$2,283/mo
Input $3.00/M · Output $15.00/M
At this workload, DeepSeek V3 is 65% cheaper than Grok 3 — a savings of $1,485/month ($17,817/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
  model: deepseek-v3
  provider: azure-ai-foundry
fallback:
  model: grok-3
  provider: xai
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 }   # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live
DeepSeek V3 Grok 3
xAI
Input price $1.14/M $3.00/M
Output price $4.56/M $15.00/M
Context window 128,000 131,072
Max output 8,192 131,072
Function calling
Vision
Audio input
Reasoning
Prompt caching
Structured output
Pricing verified May 12, 2026 May 12, 2026
Cheaper option
~70% cheaper than Grok 3
Larger context
131,072 tokens
More capabilities
2 of 6 capability flags advertised

Benchmark comparison

Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.

Chatbot Arena ELOgeneral
DeepSeek V3
1,310
Grok 3
1,402
MATHmath
DeepSeek V3
90.2%
Grok 3
MMLUgeneral
DeepSeek V3
88.5%
Grok 3
HumanEvalcode
DeepSeek V3
82.6%
Grok 3
MMLU-Proreasoning⚠ different settings
DeepSeek V3
75.9%
Grok 3
79.9%
GPQA Diamondreasoning
DeepSeek V3
59.1%
Grok 3
75.4%
AIME 2024math
DeepSeek V3
39.6%
Grok 3
52.2%
SWE-bench Verifiedagent
DeepSeek V3
42.0%
Grok 3
LiveCodeBenchcode
DeepSeek V3
40.5%
Grok 3