Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 3

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 3: Grok 3 is cheaper by 40% on average. Claude Opus 4.6 from Azure AI Foundry (200,000-token context, reasoning, tool calls) vs. Grok 3 from xAI (131,072-token context, tool calls). Use Agent Command Center to A/B both in shadow mode and pick the winner per workload.

Side-by-side cost

Live workload comparison

Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.

3,000
0200,000
400
0131,072
5,000
01,000,000
Azure AI Foundry
$3,805/mo
Input $5.00/M · Output $25.00/M
Grok 3Cheaper
xAI
$2,283/mo
Input $3.00/M · Output $15.00/M
At this workload, Grok 3 is 40% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 — a savings of $1,522/month ($18,263/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
  model: grok-3
  provider: xai
fallback:
  model: claude-opus-4-6
  provider: azure-ai-foundry
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 }   # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live
Claude Opus 4.6 Grok 3
xAI
Input price $5.00/M $3.00/M
Output price $25.00/M $15.00/M
Context window 200,000 131,072
Max output 128,000 131,072
Function calling
Vision
Audio input
Reasoning
Prompt caching
Structured output
Pricing verified May 12, 2026 May 12, 2026
Cheaper option
~40% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6
Larger context
200,000 tokens
More capabilities
5 of 6 capability flags advertised

Benchmark comparison

Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.

Chatbot Arena ELOgeneral
Claude Opus 4.6
1,502
Grok 3
1,402
τ-bench (retail)agent
Claude Opus 4.6
91.9%
Grok 3
GPQA Diamondreasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
91.3%
Grok 3
75.4%
MMLUgeneral
Claude Opus 4.6
91.1%
Grok 3
SWE-bench Verifiedagent
Claude Opus 4.6
81.4%
Grok 3
MMLU-Proreasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
Grok 3
79.9%
MMMU-Promultimodal
Claude Opus 4.6
73.9%
Grok 3
ARC-AGI-2reasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
68.8%
Grok 3
Humanity's Last Examreasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
53.0%
Grok 3
AIME 2024math
Claude Opus 4.6
Grok 3
52.2%