Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13): GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13) is cheaper by 63%. Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic (1,000,000-token context) vs. GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13) from Azure OpenAI (272,000-token context). Use Agent Command Center to A/B both in shadow mode and pick the winner per workload.

Side-by-side cost

Live workload comparison

Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.

3,000
01,000,000
400
0128,000
5,000
01,000,000
Anthropic
$3,805/mo
Input $5.00/M · Output $25.00/M
Azure OpenAI
$1,179/mo
Input $1.25/M · Output $10.00/M
At this workload, GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13) is 69% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.6 — a savings of $2,625/month ($31,503/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
  model: gpt-5-1-2025-11-13
  provider: azure-openai
fallback:
  model: claude-opus-4-6
  provider: anthropic
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 }   # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live
Claude Opus 4.6 GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
Input price $5.00/M $1.25/M
Output price $25.00/M $10.00/M
Context window 1,000,000 272,000
Max output 128,000 128,000
Function calling
Vision
Audio input
Reasoning
Prompt caching
Structured output
Pricing verified May 16, 2026 May 16, 2026
Cheaper option
~63% cheaper than the priciest in this pair
Larger context
1,000,000 tokens
More capabilities
5 of 6 capability flags advertised

Benchmark comparison

Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.

Chatbot Arena ELOgeneral
Claude Opus 4.6
1,502
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
τ-bench (retail)agent
Claude Opus 4.6
91.9%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
GPQA Diamondreasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
91.3%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
MMLUgeneral
Claude Opus 4.6
91.1%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
SWE-bench Verifiedagent
Claude Opus 4.6
81.4%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
MMMU-Promultimodal
Claude Opus 4.6
73.9%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
ARC-AGI-2reasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
68.8%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)
Humanity's Last Examreasoning
Claude Opus 4.6
53.0%
GPT 5.1 (2025-11-13)