Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) vs OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) (Anthropic, 200,000-token context) versus OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro (OpenRouter, 272,000-token context). Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) is cheaper by 52% on a blended token mix. Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) uniquely supports pdf input and structured output (json schema). Use the live calculator below to plug your real usage shape into both, then route the winner via Agent Command Center for shadow A/B without code changes.

Bottom line — Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) vs OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) and OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro target overlapping workloads but differ sharply on economics. Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) runs roughly 52% cheaper on a blended input-plus-output token mix, which translates to approximately $73,800 per month at mid-market volume (100K requests/day). The gap compounds at enterprise scale, making the cost axis the first filter most teams apply when deciding between these two models.

On capability surface area, the models diverge: Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports pdf input where the other does not; Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports structured output (json schema) where the other does not; Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports prompt caching where the other does not. These differences are binary — either your workload needs the capability or it does not. Check whether any critical path in your agent pipeline depends on a capability only one model provides before committing to a migration.

For teams evaluating both models, the recommended path is a shadow A/B test: route production traffic through an OpenAI-compatible gateway, mirror a percentage to the candidate model, score both responses with an automated evaluator (faithfulness, tool-call correctness, latency), and compare cohort-level metrics over two weeks. Future AGI Agent Command Center supports this pattern with a single `base_url` change and built-in evaluators from the ai-evaluation SDK.

Side-by-side cost

Live workload comparison

Same workload run through both models. The cheaper one is highlighted.

3,000
0272,000
400
0128,000
5,000
01,000,000
Anthropic
$11,414/mo
Input $15.00/M · Output $75.00/M
OpenRouter
$19,815/mo
Input $21.00/M · Output $168/M
At this workload, Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) is 42% cheaper than OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro — a savings of $8,401/month ($100,809/year).
Production recipe — Agent Command Center
strategy: cost-optimized
primary:
  model: claude-opus-4-1-20250805
  provider: anthropic
fallback:
  model: openai-gpt-5-2-pro
  provider: openrouter
shadow: { sample_rate: 0.05 }   # mirror 5% of traffic to compare quality live
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
Input price $15.00/M $21.00/M
Output price $75.00/M $168/M
Context window 200,000 272,000
Max output 32,000 128,000
Function calling
Vision
Audio input
Reasoning
Prompt caching
Structured output
Pricing verified Aug 6, 2026 Aug 6, 2026
Cheaper option
~52% cheaper than the priciest in this pair
Larger context
272,000 tokens
More capabilities
5 of 6 capability flags advertised

Benchmark comparison

Side-by-side public benchmark scores. Greener bar = winner.

Chatbot Arena ELOgeneral
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
1,447
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
HumanEvalcode
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
92.4%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
IFEvalgeneral
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
89.1%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
MMLU-Proreasoning
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
87.0%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
BFCL v3agent
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
86.3%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
GPQA Diamondreasoning
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
79.6%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
MMMUmultimodal
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
79.1%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
SWE-bench Verifiedagent
Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
74.5%
OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro

Cost at scale: monthly spend at three usage volumes

Estimated monthly cost assuming 1,000 input + 200 output tokens per request — a realistic chat-agent shape. Adjust your own usage in the calculator at the top of this page for an exact number.

Scale Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro Delta
Startup
10K requests/day
$9,000 /mo $16,380 /mo $7,380/mo
Mid-market
100K requests/day
$90,000 /mo $163,800 /mo $73,800/mo
Enterprise
1M requests/day
$900,000 /mo $1,638,000 /mo $738,000/mo

At enterprise scale (1M requests/day), a difference of even ~10% in unit price compounds into thousands of dollars per month. Cached input pricing and batch tiers can shift this further — both are surfaced on each model's own page.

When to choose which

Picked from the data above — not vendor marketing. Match the rules to your workload, not the other way around.

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)

You're cost-sensitive at scale — Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) runs ~52% cheaper on a blended in+out token mix, compounding into thousands of dollars per month at production volume.

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)

You re-send the same large system prompt across requests — Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports prompt caching, cutting input cost on repeat hits.

Capability diff — what you gain and lose on the swap

A specific list of what each model has that the other doesn't. If your workload depends on a row in Only Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05), switching to OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro means re-architecting that path (and vice versa).

Only on Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)
  • • PDF input
  • • Structured output (JSON schema)
  • • Prompt caching
Only on OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro
Nothing — everything OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro ships is also on Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05).
Capabilities both share (4)
  • ✓ Function calling
  • ✓ Vision input
  • ✓ Streaming
  • ✓ Native reasoning mode

Migration considerations

Concrete differences to wire through your stack before you flip traffic from one to the other.

  • Max output tokens differ: 32,000 on Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) vs 128,000 on OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro. Long-form generation tasks may truncate differently — adjust streaming UI and chunking accordingly.
  • Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) has capabilities OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro lacks: PDF input, Structured output (JSON schema), Prompt caching. Switching to OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro means re-architecting any flow that depends on these.
  • Provider changes from Anthropic to OpenRouter. API authentication, rate-limit policy, regional availability, and billing all shift. Most teams route through an OpenAI-compatible gateway (e.g., Future AGI Agent Command Center) so the swap is a single `base_url` change instead of an SDK rewrite.

How to A/B test Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) vs OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro in production

If you're stuck between the two, run them side-by-side on real traffic. Four steps the Future AGI team uses internally:

  1. 1. Point your existing OpenAI SDK at https://gateway.futureagi.com/v1. No code change beyond base_url and a virtual key.
  2. 2. Mark Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) primary, mirror 20% of traffic to OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro in shadow mode. Both responses are logged; only the primary is served to users.
  3. 3. Score every shadow response with an evaluator — faithfulness, tool-call correctness, response latency, cost. Built-in evaluators in ai-evaluation cover the common axes.
  4. 4. Compare cohort-level metrics after two weeks. Switch primary when the candidate wins on what matters to your workload — and stays within your latency budget.

Full walkthrough on the Agent Command Center page.

FAQ — Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) vs OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) or OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) is cheaper by roughly 52% on a blended input + output token mix. Input prices are $15.00/M for Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) versus $21.00/M for OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro; output prices are $75.00/M versus $168/M. The exact savings depend on your input:output ratio — use the live calculator above to plug in your own request shape.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) versus OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports up to 200,000 tokens of context. OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro supports up to 272,000 tokens. OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro has the larger window by a factor of 1.4x, which matters for long-document RAG, multi-turn agent sessions, and tasks that need to keep an entire codebase in working memory.

Do Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) and OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro both support tool calling?

Yes — both Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) and OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro support native function calling. Both also support structured output via JSON schema, so an agent can be ported between them with the same tool definitions.

Which model supports prompt caching for cost reduction?

Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports prompt caching; the other does not. If your agent has a stable system prompt + retrieval context block that repeats across requests, Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) gives you a 50–90% discount on those repeated input tokens at the provider level.

When should I choose Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) over OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro?

You're cost-sensitive at scale — Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) runs ~52% cheaper on a blended in+out token mix, compounding into thousands of dollars per month at production volume. You re-send the same large system prompt across requests — Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) supports prompt caching, cutting input cost on repeat hits.

When should I choose OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro over Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)?

On the data this page surfaces, OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro is the right pick when Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05)'s lower price or different capability profile aren't a fit for your workload. Run the live calculator above against your actual usage shape to confirm.

How do I A/B test Claude Opus 4.1 (2025-08-05) against OpenAI GPT 5.2 Pro in production?

Route both through an OpenAI-compatible gateway like Future AGI Agent Command Center with shadow mode enabled. Send 100% of traffic to your primary model, mirror 10–20% to the candidate, score every response with an evaluator (faithfulness, tool-call correctness, response time), and compare cohort-level metrics for two weeks. Switch when the candidate wins on the metrics that matter to your workload and stays within your latency budget.